![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Is incest really best?
What spurred this discussion on incest was a reply from my last inquiry about disturbing fics.
dphearson mentioned anything James/Harry being certifiably squickable.
So I asked what she had to say about Lucius/Draco. I was not surprised to find out she wasn't quite as bothered by this. And you know what? She's not alone in thinking this way. Many people have issues with light sider incest.
So this just begs the question;
Where do we draw the line in the sand concerning incest in fanfiction?
What makes one pairing more justifiable than the others? When it all comes down to it - it's still incest.
There's Malfoycest, Pottercest, Weasleycest, and Blackcest.
Any why does it seem confined to the males? Lucius abuses Draco but Narcissa abusing Draco is almost inconceivable.
Since purebloods marry within their circle, incest seems inevitable.
Sirius is related to Narcissa Malfoy and Arthur Weasley.
And since Sirius is Harry's godfather, isn't he considered family?
Does incest have to be blood related to be considered taboo?
So many questions regarding this topic. I'd love to hear your thoughts.
--P
What spurred this discussion on incest was a reply from my last inquiry about disturbing fics.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
So I asked what she had to say about Lucius/Draco. I was not surprised to find out she wasn't quite as bothered by this. And you know what? She's not alone in thinking this way. Many people have issues with light sider incest.
So this just begs the question;
Where do we draw the line in the sand concerning incest in fanfiction?
What makes one pairing more justifiable than the others? When it all comes down to it - it's still incest.
There's Malfoycest, Pottercest, Weasleycest, and Blackcest.
Any why does it seem confined to the males? Lucius abuses Draco but Narcissa abusing Draco is almost inconceivable.
Since purebloods marry within their circle, incest seems inevitable.
Sirius is related to Narcissa Malfoy and Arthur Weasley.
And since Sirius is Harry's godfather, isn't he considered family?
Does incest have to be blood related to be considered taboo?
So many questions regarding this topic. I'd love to hear your thoughts.
--P
no subject
Date: 2004-10-03 06:29 pm (UTC)I've read some Narcissa/Draco, that was interesting. It's more disturbing than Lucius/Draco, somehow. Maybe because Narcissa is so cool (as in, cold) in the books; losing control like that is not something you'd expect from her. Lucius is more prone to losing control, if you just go by the books.
I think all kinds of incest would be taboo, also if there's no blood relation. Stepfather/stepchild is also a taboo. I think the taboo is more on the trust of the child a parent is abusing nowadays, than the bloodline. Although...Cousincest still isn't acceptable, either.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-03 07:59 pm (UTC)I think maybe the whole mother/father thing... it's a stereotype, but the father is less closely connected to the child since he didn't bear it so he can ignore the fact that it's related by blood, but the mother... dom!mom incest is almost like severely twisted masturbation, that kid's a part of you! Sorry to ramble, just trying to think it out.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2004-10-03 06:34 pm (UTC)And, personally, I see no difference between Pottercest and Malfoycest. I admit that I enjoy both of them, because I'm a sick puppy, but I don't understand how Malfoycest can be "better" simply because they're supposed to be the bad guys.
Also, Harry/Sirius is completely incest. Just because they're not related by blood doesn't make it not incest - the same way that a stepfather with their stepchildren, or a parent with their adopted child. I realize that it's lega in a lot of places, but I'd argue that the emotions are exactly the same. In fact, the reason I can't read a lot of Harry/Sirius is that it doesn't deal with that.
Eh.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-03 06:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-03 06:44 pm (UTC)In HP, I'm pretty much squicked by any incestuous pairing, consensual or not. (The only exception is Narcissa/Bellatrix and I'm not quite sure why. It just is.) And I don't think I really like cross-gen incest at all. Only your post has just given me an idea for some, so if I write it, it's all your fault!
But in some fandoms, I very much enjoy consensual brother-sister incest. Eomer/Eowyn. Simon/River. Luke/Leia, so long as they *know* about it. Not so much about the same-sex twincest, though. (Well, OK, Jessica/Elizabeth would be pretty hot.)
Maybe the light- versus dark-side prefs is that most people view incest as wrong and they don't want the nice Weasleys portrayed that way. Or maybe the Malfoys are just a more attractive family. *g*
no subject
Date: 2004-10-03 06:45 pm (UTC)I occasionally had to read incest fics when I was on the DA fic committee, and I have to say that was my least favorite part of the job.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-03 06:48 pm (UTC)As for my personal opinion on incest, it doesn't matter if it's male/male, female/female or male/female it's just squickable to me. It doesn't matter if it's Pottercest/Blackcest/Weasleycest or Malfoycest. I don't care if it's light or dark. For me the line is drawn at family relations.
I don't consider myself a prude - just not into incest.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-04 12:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-03 06:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-03 07:05 pm (UTC)Having said that, I can't read it. Personal choice, of course...I have friends who love it (and who write it), but I don't enjoy it, probably for many of the the same reasons I dislike Dom/sub scenarios: it's all about the power dynamic - and the lack of balance therein. For me, this extends all the way to Harry with Sirius or Harry with Remus (since I see both of them as acting in loco parentis to him) or even Snape with Dumbledore in *most* people's stories, since a lot of those stories have a very strong incest vibe.
Oddly enough, I *don't* have the same reaction to Fred/George stories. I don't seek them out, but when I come across them, I'm usually fine with the relationship because it feels natural to me, for some reason (and equal).
Cousins, though? No problem. The nature of the relationship is more important to me than the blood tie.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-03 07:17 pm (UTC)While I also have friends who love incest stories, I usually can't enjoy them. The power balance is just too off for my tatstes. I can do student/teacher especially with a powerful student like Harry and a non fatherly teacher like Snape. I'm bothered less by sibling incest and not by cousin incest.
As for dom/sub, when it's consensual play between equals rather than a natural part of an uneven power dynamic, I love it. However, a d/s parent/child fic would bother me immensely. I guess I can kind of see Malfoycest because Lucius is evil and liable to do all manner of nasty things.
OK, done rambling for now.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2004-10-03 07:07 pm (UTC)I first had a taste of incestfic quite a few moons ago when I read Simon&Simon brotherfic. Back then it was considered very squicky by the majority of fans, was quite an underground thing in fact. I enjoyed it because the relationship between the character was so loving, and going from that to a sexual relationship was very 'easy' for me.
See, incest has been taboo for many thousands of years between the different sexes for a very good reason - it prevents interbreeding. Having been involved in the cat breeding world for some years, I know what problems you can get with line breeding (that is, breeding fathers to daughters and mothers to sons). So, aside from any moral aspects, its bad for the breed/race to allow parents to have sex with their children.
We humans, of course, add another layer to the pure biological aspect by - quite rightly - saying that it is wrong for parents to have sex with their children and for siblings to have sex. In real life, it is very wrong, and that tends to colour our opinions of incestfic, the same way that paedophilia colours our opinions of chan/underage fic. Sometimes its difficult to differentiate between fantasy and reality, or at least, to differentiate our opinions of the two.
Take Lord of the Rings for example. That fandom has a substantial brotherfic body of work for Faramir and Boromir. I would hazard a guess that interest in this pairing is very much triggered by the fact that two very attractive males play the characters in the movies, that in the few scenes they are seen together they obviously have a strong bond in the face of their father's dislike to Faramir, and all that triggers a desire to put them together.
For Lucius/Draco, you have two blondes, the eldest of whom is attractive, powerful, manipulative and erotic. That's a receipe for slashdom right there. Since they live in an environment where bad behaviour is considered the norm, it wouldn't be that big a step to imagine them indulging in sexual activity.
I've never felt any interest in Harry/James, because James is pretty a well a non-event for me, and personally I'd rather pair Harry with someone far more interesting, like Snape. It's more that lack of interest in one character than any particular aversion to the notion.
I don't see Sirius/Harry as being incest, because they have no blood relationship (at least, no close relationship). There are certainly issues of control and trust, but that's true in the teacher/student set up, too.
Thanks for the chance to ramble, I should shut up now. (-:
no subject
Date: 2004-10-13 09:12 pm (UTC)JenniferLupin
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2004-10-03 07:07 pm (UTC)my point is... nothing squicks me cept ron/ginny slightly. yeah.
):
but of course i find incest horrible in real life. its just.. fic it doesnt matter to me. i dunno :P im just jaded to internet stuff now
no subject
Date: 2004-10-03 07:14 pm (UTC)However, if Harry decided he wants to shag Sirius, I would have little or no qualms with this because 1) there's no blood relation and 2) honestly, I don't really see any sort of father/son relationship between the two of them. They just don't know each other that well. Does Harry look up to him and trust him? Yes. Is he a father-figure? Not really. He doesn't have the chance to be one. Sirius would have some serious angst and thinking to go through first before a relationship could start, but I can see it. If anything, Remus could possibly be considered a father figure, but should he and Harry hook up, it wouldn't squick me because, again, he's not around for Harry to start to truly see him as a father-figure. *shrugs*
Pottercest? Don't like it. Especially if it's necrophilia. But even if James/Lily were alive, I still wouldn't like it.
So far as Malfoycest goes, I don't like it either. I just can't see it happening. Lucius/Narcissa crucio-ing his son? Sure. Raping him? No. However, considering the pureblooded society as a whole, I can see Draco marrying a cousin to preserve the "quality" of their blood and the only mild problem I would have with that if it were a first cousin he was hooking up with.
Despite all that, I find myself strangely attracted to twincest when it's twins/someone. I just... like twins, especially when they're sandwiching someone. *shivers*
no subject
Date: 2004-10-10 11:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-03 07:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-03 08:04 pm (UTC)I'm completely un-squicked by incest fic - in fact, I didn't even realise that I'm a... supporter(?) until I really thought about it. In my last fandom (Star Wars) I read all the Vader/Luke I could get my hands on, which at the time wasn't much at all (no idea if it's more popular now... I hope so!), but I don't think that it interested me for the incest angle - more the power dynamic between the two. Even though my preferred Vader/Luke was post-ESB. No, I don't get it either.
But recently, I've been really hooked by James/Harry bunnies, and I've actually given the issue some thought. James/Harry is the only scenario where I'll tolerate an outright AU, for instance. And to be honest, I can't really be sure why I'm suddenly so interested - with J/H, there's no obvious power struggle (apart from the usual cross-gen aspect) like there is with Vader/Luke, unless you make James the bad guy.
But I'm not sure it's the actual incest that interests me. I don't read Lucius/Draco, but only because I can't stand Draco. I don't read Weasleycest, because I can't work up any real interest for Weasleys. But I will read Blackcest, even though I don't like Sirius (in canon) or Andromeda (in fic). So, I guess I can conclude that it's more about the characters than the power dynamic.
I don't know, I don't think any of that made sense. :-)
no subject
Date: 2004-10-14 01:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-03 08:26 pm (UTC)I prefer the "long lost" scenarios to the stories where the Potters never died and Harry is totally raised by James.
I suspect some of the Lucius/Draco abuse comes from Jason Isaacs' portrayal. In the book Draco is chastised for having lower marks than a Mudblood, not smacked up by the pimp cane.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-03 08:37 pm (UTC)Eh, I've read a few abusive!Narcissa fics. Obviously they're not as violent as the Lucius ones, and are far more twisted and Freudian, but 'cest seems to have less popularity in a lot of het circles when compared to the slash ones, so this could be the reason.
I find Sirius/Harry to be very very close to incest, or sometimes, if it's written so, practically incest itself. Doesn't put me off reading it though. I do love my Sirry.
There's very little I won't read if it's well written, so I've read Pottercest, Weasleycest and Malfoycest, never any Blackcest though. My favourite is still the Weasley Twins though, cos they're just sex incarnate.
It's true about the "light sider" thing, and I think that's why there's more Malfoycest out there than there is Pottercest. Even though I think really abusive!Lucius is totally OOC, there seems to be a perception of the man that there are no levels which he will not stoop to, which I also think is very fucking misguided and wrong.
I love your icon btw. Mmm milk.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-03 08:40 pm (UTC)I do like chan, but I don't like much parent/child because it usually falls into the betraying the trust of the child, and noncon perpetrated by a "nice" character bothers me enough that I steer clear. Lucius/Draco is probably one of two parent/child pairings I like (the other being Denethor/Faramir) and in both cases the parent is already shown as being somewhat abusive/uncaring to their child. I think mother/child is a bit more taboo because there's more of a built in thing of being closer because of giving birth to and the perception that a mother must/will always protect their child.
One interesting thing that I've come across in other discussions on incest is that people who don't like brotherslash often have close relationships to their own siblings which mirror those that people like to slash. So while not everyone has siblings, most everyone has parents, and it could be that subconsciously comparing their own relationship with their mother/father makes the incest fic unappealing. I've also discovered that some people who like twincest, don't like other forms of incest because it's written much more like selfslash or two bodies, one person.
Interesting anyway. *waves brotherslash banner*
no subject
Date: 2004-10-03 08:42 pm (UTC)Speaking only for myself here, there needs to be something a bit more to the story than just the kink--maybe some psychological creepiness or wizarding culture weirdness for instance--in order to get me hooked in. As a result, I'd probably find a generic Narcissa/Draco story more interesting than a George/Fred story, since the latter pairing seems (and I fully admit, I haven't sampled them all! :-) to foster more pure kinkfic than the former. I have read numerous Draco/Lucius stories that were intriguing, and nifty Harry/Sirius ones, and Arthur/One-Of-His-Kids stories, and so forth, but generally, there was always something else about them that kept me reading, it wasn't the kinky transgressiveness of the incest. How near or far the familial relationship is doesn't play a role in whether I like or dislike the story.
There is also the problem that I need to be (at least somewhat) interested in the characters involved in the story, and since I find it difficult to work up much enthusiasm for George or Fred (or Percy or Ginny or Charlie or Parvati, etc. for instance) so I'd have to overcome *that* hurdle first. :-)
no subject
Date: 2004-10-03 09:09 pm (UTC)I don not consider pseudo-parents or chan incest, like Harry with Remus, Sirius, or Snape. Those all have their own dynamic but not incest... I don't consider Sirius/Harry incest because they're not related by blood and they do not have a long standing pseudoparent relationship in canon, Harry actually feels more mature than Sirius most of the time.
Weasleycest of all kinds I enjoy just because it's a big family which suggests an overabundance of sex in the first place to produce all those children, and then all the likelyhood of older children bathing or caring for younger etc. etc. Twincest is almost old hat to me, and Bill/Charlie is absolutely endearing to me because they are older almost by a generation to the younger children which sets them apart together. Ron/Ginny is easy to understand because of his protective/possessive dynamic with her... other pairings would be new and interesting to me... I have never read any Weasley parent incest but I would be interested.
I guess the whole thing with me is, I'm interested in incest when it explores when loving affectionate family relationships cross over into sexual affection. For that reason I'm pretty much mostly concerned with Weasleycest. Pottercest is too AU unless it's necrophilia, and sometimes I'll read it just to get a taste of that kink. Blackcest just doesn't interest me at all because the tight family dynamic isn't there. Incest in an already dark affectionless family is uninteresting to me because it's just another form of already prevelant abuse/neglect so it doesn't really stand out.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-03 09:26 pm (UTC)Other incest pairings - whether I read them depends on the author and how IC they make the characters, what the plot is etc. Otherwise I don't read them as much, but they don't squick or bother me. Just my two Knuts.
Love & Serpents' Kisses,
Anath.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-03 09:35 pm (UTC)I do draw two lines though, one between 'het-incest' and 'homo-incest', and one between blood-related and not blood-related. This is mostly, because I think very biological about those things.
The first: there is indeed one special reason why incest in general should not happen. (That is not abuse, because abuse can happen everywhere, not only in incest.) That reason is genetics. For a child from an incestuous relationship, the chances of genetic problems are increased. Thus, there is of course a major difference between het and homosexual incest. MalePreg and FemmePreg are just not remotely real and won't be quite for a while. Those biological thoughts have a lot of weight for me.
The second: I absolutely cannot get myself to see something like Sirius/Harry as incest. The concept of a godfather is bound to certain cultural, mostly religious ideas. I don't believe in those ideas. Sirius is not really Harry's family. He's simply supposed to watch over him in place of his real family. The same with many non-blood 'family' members. So yes, of course there is a difference.
Why incest can still kink me? Because of the questions of trust, power and social conventions. Which of course can be done in any other relationship as well.
BTW, when I talked to a friend, who was squicked by incest, about her reasons, she said she would project fictional incest on her own reality, and she just didn't want to imagine getting it on with her brother. When I think of my own siblings, I find her arguementation quite convincing ;)
no subject
Date: 2004-10-03 10:37 pm (UTC)It's weird, but I do have a strange 'levels of badness' system in my head--I find parent/child incest more squicky than sibling, and I find mother/child a bit more squicky than father/child. I'm not sure why... well, I have an idea, but it would take a while to fully explore.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-03 11:21 pm (UTC)In general, parent/child incest disturbs me a lot because of the power imbalance. The exception to me would be Malfoycest because I'm used enough to the fanon tradition, and because the characters seemed messed up enough that incest would be the least of their problems. I've written inlaw incest between Pansy and both elder Malfoys, and found it more of a frisson than a squick because all parties were adult and consenting.
Sibling incest, especially of the Fred/George variety, doesn't trouble me as much because I see them more as equals. This would depend a lot also on their relative ages. While I probably wouldn't be too interested/turned on by a Bill/Ron fic, I could probably take it or leave it if they were both adults. If Ron were underaged, it would be a definite squick.Bill/Charley would bother me much less. I'm currently writing a Sirius/Regulus fic, and again it's consensual, the two are roughly the same age, and they're already screwed up so it feels in character.
Sirius/Harry used to squick me deeply until OotP. I saw them as having much more of a father/son dynamic in GoF, with Sirius as the parental advisor figure and Harry as the juvenile who looked up to him. I couldn't bear the thought of Sirry in that context. With OotP, Sirius is on a closer social and emotional level with Harry, and Harry is, let's face it, checking Sirius out on a regular basis. While I don't think it's intentional, there's enough of a canonical UST vibe to now make me feel that Harry/Sirius is a highly believable pairing, with just a frisson of incestuous overtone to add spark to it. The fact that they're godfather/godson still gives it a "forbidden fruit" feeling to it, but they feel like equals to me.
While it's not incest, I have a similar feeling with Snape/Harry: they're not equals strictly speaking, but they have so many emotional problems and similarities that they feel much more on the same level to me than, say, Snape/Hermione. Which *would* squick me, because Hermione feels like a student, pure and simple, and Snape, with Hermione, feels very much the teacher in charge.
Does that make sense?
no subject
Date: 2004-10-04 02:27 am (UTC)Sibling incest don't squick me. I'm not all that much interested by Ron/ or Ginny/ -cest. Blame the OTPs.
I really like Blackcest, but I'm a Blackaholic, so there's the reason. And of those, Bellatrix/Narcissa is the one I like the least, because I'm an Andromeda-fan, and I always have the feeling the pairing seems to make a simple, stupid, bland goody-goody out of her. (And this is entirely due to my completely irrational mind, because I don't read Bellatrix/Narcissa and don't think I ever did. I only know how myu own mind works, and that's the feeling I get from the simple pairing. This has nothing to do with the fics or anything.)
Also, cousins isn't incest to me. It's legal where I live, so I never really looked at it as incest.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-04 03:02 am (UTC)And as for purebloods marrying in their own circle, I don't think they've gone so low as outright incest. Being vaguely related to all your potential marriage partners is one thing. Marrying your sister is entirely different. For what I consider incest, I think first cousin is pushing it, and anything past that is not a big deal (ie second cousin onward). For me it has more to do with how close the characters are, not necessarily in blood relations. If two people who are not related were raised together as siblings, that would count for incest(ish) with me. Two people who are first cousins but never knew it (or each other), doesn't squick me nearly as much.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-04 05:25 am (UTC)I'm one of those that enjoy reading and writing incest and chan, so I guess the reason I prefer one incestual pairing over another is purely because I like those characters more, and also that I see it as more plausible.
Pottercest is a pairing that I never read though, because it doesn't interest me. If it shows up in a fic I'm reading, ok. But I don't look for it. This is mainly because to me it would always imply necrophilia, and even if I read and write necro in LotR, I think that maggot-infested James/Harry thing squicked me out of this pairing. I was fine with reading it up until the creepy crawlies, because THAT is one of my absolute major squicks! Not decomposing bodies, or animated corpses, but maggots and flies. The other thing James/Harry implies is that Harry would have been a baby, up to 1 year old. And that is not ok for me. I suppose I draw the line somewhere around 10 years old...
Narcissa/Draco? Ewwww. Not because the mother does it and that would be more taboo, but simply because it's het. *grins* And I don't write or read femslash, so no Molly/Ginny for me.
I would look at Sirius/Harry as slightly incestous, because of the father figure thing, and Sirius being godfather. But more paedophilia though, of course depending on Harry's age. If it's an established family relation, it could be incest even without the blood relation. An adopted child is still considered the parent's own child, and if that parent abused the child, people wouldn't say that it's ok... There's the trust issue in these relationships that makes them interesting for me. As with some teacher/student pairings. Trust and authority... being used for this end. I see it as very probable among DE families, but it's interesting to see it in the 'noble' Gryffindor families too, if it's written as something else but brother-love-fluff.
I agree that the pureblood families are running out of non-related people to marry *grins* Cousin marriages wouldn't be completely unheard of. And then the inbreeding starts. What would happen if Voldemort wins the war, and the pureblood families keep breeding on each other? How many generations before weird things begin to show up? And what would they be - strange magical powers, physical deformities, mental illness?