Keeper of the Superfluous Es! (
themostepotente) wrote2005-11-18 07:08 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
So I jumped on the George R.R. Martin bandwagon...
I bought 'A Game of Thrones' yesterday. Long ass book with small ass print. I swore I'd never read another book this long after Jonathan Strange and Mr Norell.
I hope I like this.
On a side note, I won't be around much this weekend. Book. Last bits of Smutmas. GOF.
Hope everyone's doing good and enjoying the movie :-)
--P
I hope I like this.
On a side note, I won't be around much this weekend. Book. Last bits of Smutmas. GOF.
Hope everyone's doing good and enjoying the movie :-)
--P
no subject
But by the end of the first book/beginning of the 2nd, I was totally hooked. :-) So if you find it difficult at first, stick with it. He takes some surprising turns.
How was Jonathan Strange and Mr Norell? I've had it for a year now and read a chunk but got sidelined and haven't been able to get back into it. Is it worth it?
no subject
Clark is VERY thorough.
no subject
no subject
no subject
The sheer volume of characters can be a bit confusing at first (with his death rate he needs to have a lot) but it's well worth it. :)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
*adds to Christmas list*
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
You'll love it.
Icarus
no subject
no subject
Comparing Tolkien and Martin? Tolkien is closer to Beowulf than Martin is to Tolkien. Okay, that came out sounding like an SAT question.
What Martin and Tolkien have in common is that they were both soldiers so they do not idealize war and battle. However, Tolkien has something to his story that seems to go beyond the war of the ring, an almost-spiritual theme of death and ending that's really powerful.
Martin sets you down in the horror of war and makes you live it. Just when you think that it's as bad as it can get... things get worse.
Tolkien is the spiritualist, dealing with vast scopes of time and writing an epic.
Martin, for all the length of his story, is more like a Vietnam reporter. He's not delving into the whys of war and humanity, instead he's reporting on the war itself, giving glimpses into the epic-sized battles through intimate experiences of the people caught in the storm.
It's more like Terry Goodkind, only considerably better, more gritty and less idealistic. Martin hasn't fallen apart in the writing so far as I've seen. He does have Goodkind's primary flaw: there are too many disconnected enemies so the series lacks the cohesion of the Lord of the Rings.
Icarus
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject